Generic Proposal Evaluator: A Lazy Learning Strategy Toward Blind Proposal Quality Assessment
Existing detection or recognition systems typically select one state-of-the-art proposal algorithm to produce massive object-covered candidate windows, and a quality metric specifically designed for this algorithm is utilized to single out small amounts of proposals. However, in practice, the accura...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2018-01, Vol.19 (1), p.306-319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Existing detection or recognition systems typically select one state-of-the-art proposal algorithm to produce massive object-covered candidate windows, and a quality metric specifically designed for this algorithm is utilized to single out small amounts of proposals. However, in practice, the accuracies of different proposal algorithms significantly change from one image content to another one. To obtain more robust proposal results, a generic proposal evaluator (GPE) is highly desired, which could choose optimal candidate windows across multiple proposal algorithms. In this paper, we propose a lazy learning strategy to train the GPE, which aims to blindly estimate the quality of each proposal without accessing to its manual annotation. Unlike the traditional end-to-end framework that learns a universal model from all training samples, we try to build query-specific training subset for each given proposal, where only its {k} -nearest-neighborhoods are collected from all labeled candidate windows. Benefits from the capability of updating the regression parameters for different visual contents, the proposed method delivers a higher quality prediction accuracy even with respect to the deep neural network learned by end-to-end method. Experimental results confirm that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms many state-of-the-art proposal quality metrics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1524-9050 1558-0016 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TITS.2017.2750070 |