Comments on "A Controllability Counterexample" and the Continuation Lemma
A Technical Note in this journal vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 840-841, June 2005, by Elliott, gives a bilinear example showing that the Euler discretization of a noncontrollable continuous-time system can be controllable. The example is correct, but there was a flaw in a result of the TN, Lemma 1 ("for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on automatic control 2015-04, Vol.60 (4), p.1169-1171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A Technical Note in this journal vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 840-841, June 2005, by Elliott, gives a bilinear example showing that the Euler discretization of a noncontrollable continuous-time system can be controllable. The example is correct, but there was a flaw in a result of the TN, Lemma 1 ("for discrete-time systems, local controllability implies controllability") that has independent interest. In this note, the lemma is reformulated as a conjecture for continuous-in-state systems, and it is also proved under additional conditions. For a class of two-dimensional bilinear systems the Euler discretization is shown directly to be small-controllable, a fortiori controllable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9286 1558-2523 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TAC.2014.2352771 |