What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation?
Contemporary time-stepping methods used in the dynamic simulation of rigid bodies suffer from problems in accuracy, performance, and robustness. Significant allowances for tuning, coupled with careful implementation of a broad phase collision detection scheme is required to make dynamic simulation u...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 964 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo Williams, Jedediyah Trinkle, Jeffrey C. |
description | Contemporary time-stepping methods used in the dynamic simulation of rigid bodies suffer from problems in accuracy, performance, and robustness. Significant allowances for tuning, coupled with careful implementation of a broad phase collision detection scheme is required to make dynamic simulation useful for practical applications. A recently developed formulation method is presented herein that is more robust, and not dependent on broad-phase collision detection or system tuning for its behavior. Several uncomplicated benchmark examples are presented to give an analysis and make a comparison of the new Polyhedral Exact Geometry time-stepping method with the well-known Stewart-Trinkle time-stepping method. The behavior and performance for the two methods are discussed. This includes specific cases where contemporary time-steppers fail, and how they are ameliorated by the new method presented here. The goal of this work is to complete the groundwork for further research into high performance simulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630689 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6630689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6630689</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6630689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-66a5944c48786e880c2e566d16ce532f5a1cffb24f9d2d1f05eee35fd9d1026b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UEtLAzEYjC-w1v4A8ZKbp615fklOUhathYIgit5KmoeN7EM2W8r-e1uspxlmhmEYhG4omVJKzP2ifJ1NGaF8CsAJaHOCJkZpKkBxCYLLUzRiUqmCaPV5hq7-DarO0YgSSQqhmLlEk5y_CSEMNBcGRmj-sbH9Xca7rm2-8C71G-zaqko5tQ32oQ-uP7DU4Hpb9Wnd-gH7obF1chnntBftIfBwjS6irXKYHHGM3p8e38rnYvkyX5SzZZGokn0BYKURwgmtNAStiWNBAngKLkjOorTUxbhmIhrPPI1EhhC4jN54uh-95mN0-9eb9sbqp0u17YbV8RP-CwxWUbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation?</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo ; Williams, Jedediyah ; Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo ; Williams, Jedediyah ; Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary time-stepping methods used in the dynamic simulation of rigid bodies suffer from problems in accuracy, performance, and robustness. Significant allowances for tuning, coupled with careful implementation of a broad phase collision detection scheme is required to make dynamic simulation useful for practical applications. A recently developed formulation method is presented herein that is more robust, and not dependent on broad-phase collision detection or system tuning for its behavior. Several uncomplicated benchmark examples are presented to give an analysis and make a comparison of the new Polyhedral Exact Geometry time-stepping method with the well-known Stewart-Trinkle time-stepping method. The behavior and performance for the two methods are discussed. This includes specific cases where contemporary time-steppers fail, and how they are ameliorated by the new method presented here. The goal of this work is to complete the groundwork for further research into high performance simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-4729</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467356417</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467356411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2577-087X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467356435</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467356433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Computational modeling ; Dynamics ; Geometry ; Mathematical model ; Solid modeling ; Trajectory</subject><ispartof>2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2013, p.959-964</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6630689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6630689$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jedediyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</creatorcontrib><title>What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation?</title><title>2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation</title><addtitle>ICRA</addtitle><description>Contemporary time-stepping methods used in the dynamic simulation of rigid bodies suffer from problems in accuracy, performance, and robustness. Significant allowances for tuning, coupled with careful implementation of a broad phase collision detection scheme is required to make dynamic simulation useful for practical applications. A recently developed formulation method is presented herein that is more robust, and not dependent on broad-phase collision detection or system tuning for its behavior. Several uncomplicated benchmark examples are presented to give an analysis and make a comparison of the new Polyhedral Exact Geometry time-stepping method with the well-known Stewart-Trinkle time-stepping method. The behavior and performance for the two methods are discussed. This includes specific cases where contemporary time-steppers fail, and how they are ameliorated by the new method presented here. The goal of this work is to complete the groundwork for further research into high performance simulation.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Solid modeling</subject><subject>Trajectory</subject><issn>1050-4729</issn><issn>2577-087X</issn><isbn>1467356417</isbn><isbn>9781467356411</isbn><isbn>9781467356435</isbn><isbn>1467356433</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UEtLAzEYjC-w1v4A8ZKbp615fklOUhathYIgit5KmoeN7EM2W8r-e1uspxlmhmEYhG4omVJKzP2ifJ1NGaF8CsAJaHOCJkZpKkBxCYLLUzRiUqmCaPV5hq7-DarO0YgSSQqhmLlEk5y_CSEMNBcGRmj-sbH9Xca7rm2-8C71G-zaqko5tQ32oQ-uP7DU4Hpb9Wnd-gH7obF1chnntBftIfBwjS6irXKYHHGM3p8e38rnYvkyX5SzZZGokn0BYKURwgmtNAStiWNBAngKLkjOorTUxbhmIhrPPI1EhhC4jN54uh-95mN0-9eb9sbqp0u17YbV8RP-CwxWUbA</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo</creator><creator>Williams, Jedediyah</creator><creator>Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation?</title><author>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo ; Williams, Jedediyah ; Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-66a5944c48786e880c2e566d16ce532f5a1cffb24f9d2d1f05eee35fd9d1026b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Solid modeling</topic><topic>Trajectory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jedediyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flickinger, Daniel Montrallo</au><au>Williams, Jedediyah</au><au>Trinkle, Jeffrey C.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation?</atitle><btitle>2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation</btitle><stitle>ICRA</stitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>959</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>959-964</pages><issn>1050-4729</issn><eissn>2577-087X</eissn><isbn>1467356417</isbn><isbn>9781467356411</isbn><eisbn>9781467356435</eisbn><eisbn>1467356433</eisbn><abstract>Contemporary time-stepping methods used in the dynamic simulation of rigid bodies suffer from problems in accuracy, performance, and robustness. Significant allowances for tuning, coupled with careful implementation of a broad phase collision detection scheme is required to make dynamic simulation useful for practical applications. A recently developed formulation method is presented herein that is more robust, and not dependent on broad-phase collision detection or system tuning for its behavior. Several uncomplicated benchmark examples are presented to give an analysis and make a comparison of the new Polyhedral Exact Geometry time-stepping method with the well-known Stewart-Trinkle time-stepping method. The behavior and performance for the two methods are discussed. This includes specific cases where contemporary time-steppers fail, and how they are ameliorated by the new method presented here. The goal of this work is to complete the groundwork for further research into high performance simulation.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630689</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-4729 |
ispartof | 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2013, p.959-964 |
issn | 1050-4729 2577-087X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6630689 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Accuracy Computational modeling Dynamics Geometry Mathematical model Solid modeling Trajectory |
title | What's wrong with collision detection in multibody dynamics simulation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T16%3A30%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=What's%20wrong%20with%20collision%20detection%20in%20multibody%20dynamics%20simulation?&rft.btitle=2013%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Robotics%20and%20Automation&rft.au=Flickinger,%20Daniel%20Montrallo&rft.date=2013-05&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=959-964&rft.issn=1050-4729&rft.eissn=2577-087X&rft.isbn=1467356417&rft.isbn_list=9781467356411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630689&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6630689%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467356435&rft.eisbn_list=1467356433&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6630689&rfr_iscdi=true |