Comparing heuristic search methods for finding effective group behaviors in RTS game

We compare genetic algorithms against hill-climbers for generating competitive unit micro-management for winning real-time strategy game skirmishes. Good group positioning and movement, which are part of unit micro-management can help win skirmishes against equal numbers and types of opponent units...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Siming Liu, Louis, Sushil J., Nicolescu, Monica
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compare genetic algorithms against hill-climbers for generating competitive unit micro-management for winning real-time strategy game skirmishes. Good group positioning and movement, which are part of unit micro-management can help win skirmishes against equal numbers and types of opponent units or even when outnumbered. In this paper, we use influence maps to generate group positioning and potential fields to guide unit movement. We tested the behaviors obtained from genetic algorithm and two types of hill-climbing search against the default Starcraft AI using the brood war API. Preliminary results show that while our hill-climbers quickly find influence maps and potential fields that generate quality positioning and movement in our simulations, they only find quality solutions fifty to seventy percent of the time. On the other hand, genetic algorithms evolve high quality solutions a hundred percent of the time, but take significantly longer.
ISSN:1089-778X
1941-0026
DOI:10.1109/CEC.2013.6557724