Importance of Cu/Al Intermetallic coverage in copper wire bonding with sensitive pad structure

The importance of copper/aluminum (Cu/Al) Intermetallic coverage (IMC) for package reliability with Copper (Cu) wire was studied in great detail. A sensitive device with 0.8μm thin aluminum (Al) metallization was selected as the most stringent test vehicle. For such sensitive devices, it was found t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yap, T. J. L., Yin Kheng Au, Poh Leng Eu
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The importance of copper/aluminum (Cu/Al) Intermetallic coverage (IMC) for package reliability with Copper (Cu) wire was studied in great detail. A sensitive device with 0.8μm thin aluminum (Al) metallization was selected as the most stringent test vehicle. For such sensitive devices, it was found that aggressive bonding parameters such as high ultrasonic (USG) bonding method have to be avoided to prevent pad cratering issues. The challenges were found to be balancing between no cratering reject, yet achieving targeted Cu/Al IMC coverage, ball shear strength per unit area and wire pull test responses. Through comprehensive bonding parameters optimization, the Cu/Al intermetallic coverage (IMC) percentage and its distribution beneath the bonded ball were found to be very important factors to achieve biased Highly Accelerated Stress Test (biased-HAST) reliability robustness. In addition, the interaction effects of epoxy molding encapsulation (EME) selection with different pH and halogen content towards the bond reliability was also studied as biased-HAST failures are related to halogen corrosion from the EME. Samples were assembled with combinations of good IMC (>60%) and poor IMC (60%, the sensitive pad devices were still able to meet all reliability stressing requirements regardless of the pH and Cl- range of the EME used. Conversely, if the IMC coverage is relatively poor (
DOI:10.1109/EMAP.2012.6507906