Is Minix more robust because it is microkernel?
In 2006, professor Tananbaum released Minix3 with a new book [15] and papers [14], [9], [8] supporting that drivers running as processes in user mode made Minix, a microkernel operating system, more reliable than monolitic operating systems. We tested Minix3 in a operating system course at São Paulo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista IEEE América Latina 2011-09, Vol.9 (5), p.838-844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In 2006, professor Tananbaum released Minix3 with a new book [15] and papers [14], [9], [8] supporting that drivers running as processes in user mode made Minix, a microkernel operating system, more reliable than monolitic operating systems. We tested Minix3 in a operating system course at São Paulo University and unfortunately, we reject some statements of professor Tanenbaum; however we claim Minix3 as a powerfull educational tool in operating system courses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1548-0992 1548-0992 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TLA.2011.6030998 |