Comments on "Radial line planar monopulse antenna"
The author points out that Miyashita and Katagi (IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol.44, p.1158-65, Aug. 1996) claim a new type of planar monopulse antenna, without reference to Kelly and Goebels (1964) that described their "invention" of the radial line planar monopulse antenna. Further,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation 1997-04, Vol.45 (4), p.748 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The author points out that Miyashita and Katagi (IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol.44, p.1158-65, Aug. 1996) claim a new type of planar monopulse antenna, without reference to Kelly and Goebels (1964) that described their "invention" of the radial line planar monopulse antenna. Further, scant mention is made of the pioneering work by Goebels and Kelly (1961) and by Kelly and Goebels (1964) in various other papers by Goto, Ando, Nakano and others. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-926X 1558-2221 |
DOI: | 10.1109/8.564104 |