A generalized scheduling approach for dynamic dataflow applications

For a number of years, dataflow concepts have provided designers of digital signal processing systems with environments capable of expressing high-level software architectures as well as low-level, performance-oriented kernels. But analysis of system-level trade-offs has been inhibited by the divers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Plishker, W., Sane, N., Bhattacharyya, S.S.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For a number of years, dataflow concepts have provided designers of digital signal processing systems with environments capable of expressing high-level software architectures as well as low-level, performance-oriented kernels. But analysis of system-level trade-offs has been inhibited by the diversity of models and the dynamic nature of modern dataflow applications. To facilitate design space exploration for software implementations of heterogeneous dataflow applications, developers need tools capable of deeply analyzing and optimizing the application. To this end, we present a new scheduling approach that leverages a recently proposed general model of dynamic dataflow called core functional dataflow (CFDF). CFDF supports high-level application descriptions with multiple models of dataflow by structuring actors with sets of modes that represent fixed behaviors. In this work we show that by decomposing a dynamic dataflow graph as directed by its modes, we can derive a set of static dataflow graphs that interact dynamically. This enables designers to readily experiment with existing dataflow model specific scheduling techniques to all or some parts of the application while applying custom schedulers to others. We demonstrate this generalized dataflow scheduling method on dynamic mixed-model applications and show that run-time and buffer sizes significantly improve compared to a baseline dynamic dataflow scheduler and simulator.
ISSN:1530-1591
1558-1101
DOI:10.1109/DATE.2009.5090642