On the comparison of classifiers' performance in emotion classification: Critiques and suggestions
In literature there is a huge body of references available which compare various classifiers in a particular application. However, the reliability of such a comparison is only valid if the model parameters, performance criteria and training environment are chosen in a fair framework, as successful a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In literature there is a huge body of references available which compare various classifiers in a particular application. However, the reliability of such a comparison is only valid if the model parameters, performance criteria and training environment are chosen in a fair framework, as successful application of a classifier is dependent on the those parameters. In this study we attempt to answer the questions below in a emotion detection framework, using classifiers such as KNN, SVM, RBF and MLP: Is the success of a classifier enough to make the claim that a classifier is "the best one" in a particular classification task? How is it possible to carry out a fair comparison between classifiers? |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2165-0608 2693-3616 |
DOI: | 10.1109/SIU.2008.4632592 |