Status of AURORA Environment Calculations
In a joint theoretical-experimental program to determine the AURORA environment, amplitude and pulse shape discrepancies were found between fields calculated with the AUR3D finite difference code and the measured surface current and charge density. Simple models traced the problem to an over-estimat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 1978-01, Vol.25 (6), p.1399-1403 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1403 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1399 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on nuclear science |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Anderson, L. M. Crevier, W. F. Merkel, G. Spohn, D. J. |
| description | In a joint theoretical-experimental program to determine the AURORA environment, amplitude and pulse shape discrepancies were found between fields calculated with the AUR3D finite difference code and the measured surface current and charge density. Simple models traced the problem to an over-estimation of the conductivity gradient near the hot spot. Both electric and magnetic fields now show much better agreement with experiment, but further work should be done to include the divergence of the Compton current due to surface effects and the geometry of AURORA's four recessed sources |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329543 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4329543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4329543</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TNS_1978_4329543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ddbd52de24222335064a4b377283a3ab8a62213e8a04c5a8ca0230003df8792b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tLw0AUhQdRMFb3gptsXSS9c2cmmVmGUKtQWuhjPdwkE4ikiWRSwX9vSqurw-E84GPsmUPMOZj5fr2LuUl1LAUaJcUNC7hSOuIq1bcsAOA6MtKYe_bg_edkpQIVsNfdSOPJh30dZoftZpuFi-67Gfru6LoxzKktTy2NTd_5R3ZXU-vd01Vn7PC22Ofv0Wqz_MizVVRiwseoqopKYeVQIqIQChJJshBpilqQoEJTgsiF0wSyVKRLAhQAIKpapwYLMWNw-S2H3vvB1fZraI40_FgO9oxqJ1R7RrVX1Gnycpk0zrn_-l_6CyAMTcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status of AURORA Environment Calculations</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Anderson, L. M. ; Crevier, W. F. ; Merkel, G. ; Spohn, D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, L. M. ; Crevier, W. F. ; Merkel, G. ; Spohn, D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>In a joint theoretical-experimental program to determine the AURORA environment, amplitude and pulse shape discrepancies were found between fields calculated with the AUR3D finite difference code and the measured surface current and charge density. Simple models traced the problem to an over-estimation of the conductivity gradient near the hot spot. Both electric and magnetic fields now show much better agreement with experiment, but further work should be done to include the divergence of the Compton current due to surface effects and the geometry of AURORA's four recessed sources</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329543</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Charge measurement ; Conductivity ; Current measurement ; Density measurement ; Finite difference methods ; Geometry ; Magnetic field measurement ; Pulse measurements ; Pulse shaping methods ; Shape measurement</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1978-01, Vol.25 (6), p.1399-1403</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ddbd52de24222335064a4b377283a3ab8a62213e8a04c5a8ca0230003df8792b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ddbd52de24222335064a4b377283a3ab8a62213e8a04c5a8ca0230003df8792b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4329543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4329543$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crevier, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkel, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spohn, D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Status of AURORA Environment Calculations</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>In a joint theoretical-experimental program to determine the AURORA environment, amplitude and pulse shape discrepancies were found between fields calculated with the AUR3D finite difference code and the measured surface current and charge density. Simple models traced the problem to an over-estimation of the conductivity gradient near the hot spot. Both electric and magnetic fields now show much better agreement with experiment, but further work should be done to include the divergence of the Compton current due to surface effects and the geometry of AURORA's four recessed sources</description><subject>Charge measurement</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Current measurement</subject><subject>Density measurement</subject><subject>Finite difference methods</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Magnetic field measurement</subject><subject>Pulse measurements</subject><subject>Pulse shaping methods</subject><subject>Shape measurement</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j0tLw0AUhQdRMFb3gptsXSS9c2cmmVmGUKtQWuhjPdwkE4ikiWRSwX9vSqurw-E84GPsmUPMOZj5fr2LuUl1LAUaJcUNC7hSOuIq1bcsAOA6MtKYe_bg_edkpQIVsNfdSOPJh30dZoftZpuFi-67Gfru6LoxzKktTy2NTd_5R3ZXU-vd01Vn7PC22Ofv0Wqz_MizVVRiwseoqopKYeVQIqIQChJJshBpilqQoEJTgsiF0wSyVKRLAhQAIKpapwYLMWNw-S2H3vvB1fZraI40_FgO9oxqJ1R7RrVX1Gnycpk0zrn_-l_6CyAMTcI</recordid><startdate>19780101</startdate><enddate>19780101</enddate><creator>Anderson, L. M.</creator><creator>Crevier, W. F.</creator><creator>Merkel, G.</creator><creator>Spohn, D. J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780101</creationdate><title>Status of AURORA Environment Calculations</title><author>Anderson, L. M. ; Crevier, W. F. ; Merkel, G. ; Spohn, D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-ddbd52de24222335064a4b377283a3ab8a62213e8a04c5a8ca0230003df8792b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Charge measurement</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Current measurement</topic><topic>Density measurement</topic><topic>Finite difference methods</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Magnetic field measurement</topic><topic>Pulse measurements</topic><topic>Pulse shaping methods</topic><topic>Shape measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crevier, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkel, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spohn, D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, L. M.</au><au>Crevier, W. F.</au><au>Merkel, G.</au><au>Spohn, D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status of AURORA Environment Calculations</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>1978-01-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1399</spage><epage>1403</epage><pages>1399-1403</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>In a joint theoretical-experimental program to determine the AURORA environment, amplitude and pulse shape discrepancies were found between fields calculated with the AUR3D finite difference code and the measured surface current and charge density. Simple models traced the problem to an over-estimation of the conductivity gradient near the hot spot. Both electric and magnetic fields now show much better agreement with experiment, but further work should be done to include the divergence of the Compton current due to surface effects and the geometry of AURORA's four recessed sources</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNS.1978.4329543</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9499 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1978-01, Vol.25 (6), p.1399-1403 |
| issn | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4329543 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Charge measurement Conductivity Current measurement Density measurement Finite difference methods Geometry Magnetic field measurement Pulse measurements Pulse shaping methods Shape measurement |
| title | Status of AURORA Environment Calculations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A58%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20of%20AURORA%20Environment%20Calculations&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Anderson,%20L.%20M.&rft.date=1978-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1399&rft.epage=1403&rft.pages=1399-1403&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNS.1978.4329543&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TNS_1978_4329543%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4329543&rfr_iscdi=true |