Segmenting Motions of Different Types by Unsupervised Manifold Clustering

We propose a novel algorithm for segmenting multiple motions of different types from point correspondences in multiple affine or perspective views. Since point trajectories associated with different motions live in different manifolds, traditional approaches deal with only one manifold type: linear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Goh, A., Vidal, R.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We propose a novel algorithm for segmenting multiple motions of different types from point correspondences in multiple affine or perspective views. Since point trajectories associated with different motions live in different manifolds, traditional approaches deal with only one manifold type: linear subspaces for affine views, and homographic, bilinear and trilinear varieties for two and three perspective views. As real motion sequences contain motions of different types, we cast motion segmentation as a problem of clustering manifolds of different types. Rather than explicitly modeling each manifold as a linear, bilinear or multilinear variety, we use nonlinear dimensionality reduction to learn a low-dimensional representation of the union of all manifolds. We show that for a union of separated manifolds, the LLE algorithm computes a matrix whose null space contains vectors giving the segmentation of the data. An analysis of the variance of these vectors allows us to distinguish them from other vectors in the null space. This leads to a new algorithm for clustering both linear and nonlinear manifolds. Although this algorithm is theoretically designed for separated manifolds, our experiments demonstrate its performance on real data where this assumption does not hold. We test our algorithm on the Hopkins 155 motion segmentation database and achieve an average classification error of 4.8%, which compares favorably against state-of-the art multiframe motion segmentation methods.
ISSN:1063-6919
DOI:10.1109/CVPR.2007.383235