Second response to comments by M.J. Neatrour on Maxwell's equations

For original papers by Harmuth see ibid., vol.28, no.4, p.250, p.259, p.267 (1986). For Neatrour's article see ibid., vol.29, no.3, p.258 (1987). The authors clarify the use of the Fourier transform for the generalization of particular solutions of partial differential equations. Using causalit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility 1988-05, Vol.30 (2), p.175-176
Hauptverfasser: Harmuth, H.F., Boules, R.N., Gray, J.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For original papers by Harmuth see ibid., vol.28, no.4, p.250, p.259, p.267 (1986). For Neatrour's article see ibid., vol.29, no.3, p.258 (1987). The authors clarify the use of the Fourier transform for the generalization of particular solutions of partial differential equations. Using causality arguments it is deduced that the Fourier transforms cannot be a physically correct solution for the partial differential equation for the magnitude of the electric field strength even though it may be mathematically correct.< >
ISSN:0018-9375
1558-187X
DOI:10.1109/15.2404