Trends in automating physical database design

A database administrator (DBA) must make many decisions about what is the best decision for a database and its users - including what is the best physical DB design decision. The DBA must determine what auxiliary data structures to create - such as indexes and materialized views - as well as the opt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zilio, D.C., Lightstone, S., Lohman, G.M.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A database administrator (DBA) must make many decisions about what is the best decision for a database and its users - including what is the best physical DB design decision. The DBA must determine what auxiliary data structures to create - such as indexes and materialized views - as well as the optimal way to partition each table in a shared-nothing partitioned system, to maximize workload performance while minimizing any increase in disk space or maintenance costs. Given the number of possible configurations, the possible interactions between each choice, and the associated constraints on the decision, the problem of selecting an optimal design is daunting for even the most skilled DBA. It has long been recognized that DBAs need tools to help them make these complex decisions, but until recently little progress was made. We present our vision for the future of automating physical DB design, and contrast it with previous attempts at solving this problem.
DOI:10.1109/INDIN.2003.1300376