A simple algorithmic characterization of uniform solvability

The Herlihy-Shavit (HS) conditions characterizing the solvability of asynchronous tasks over n processors have been a milestone in the development of the theory of distributed computing. Yet, they were of no help when researcher sought algorithms that do not depend on n. To help in this pursuit we i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Gafni, E.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Herlihy-Shavit (HS) conditions characterizing the solvability of asynchronous tasks over n processors have been a milestone in the development of the theory of distributed computing. Yet, they were of no help when researcher sought algorithms that do not depend on n. To help in this pursuit we investigate the uniform solvability of an infinite uniform sequence of tasks T/sub 0/, T/sub 1/, T/sub 2/,..., where T/sub i/ is a task over processors p/sub 0/, p/sub 1/,...,p/sub i/, and T/sub i/ extends T/sub i-1/. We say that such a sequence is uniformly solvable if there exit protocols to solve each T/sub i/ and the protocol for T/sub i/ extends the protocol for T/sub i-1/. This paper establishes that although each T/sub i/ may be solvable, the uniform sequence is not necessarily uniformly solvable. We show this by proposing a novel uniform sequence of solvable tasks and proving that the sequence is not amenable to a uniform solution. We then extend the HS conditions for a task over n processors, to uniform solvability in a natural way. The technique we use to accomplish this is to generalize the alternative algorithmic proof, by Borowsky and Gafni, of the HS conditions, by showing that the infinite uniform sequence of task of Immediate Snapshots is uniformly solvable. A side benefit of the technique is a widely applicable methodology for the development of uniform protocols.
ISSN:0272-5428
DOI:10.1109/SFCS.2002.1181946