GeoDTR+: Toward Generic Cross-View Geolocalization via Geometric Disentanglement

Cross-View Geo-Localization (CVGL) estimates the location of a ground image by matching it to a geo-tagged aerial image in a database. Recent works achieve outstanding progress on CVGL benchmarks. However, existing methods still suffer from poor performance in cross-area evaluation, in which the tra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 2024-12, Vol.46 (12), p.10419-10433
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Xiaohan, Li, Xingyu, Sultani, Waqas, Chen, Chen, Wshah, Safwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cross-View Geo-Localization (CVGL) estimates the location of a ground image by matching it to a geo-tagged aerial image in a database. Recent works achieve outstanding progress on CVGL benchmarks. However, existing methods still suffer from poor performance in cross-area evaluation, in which the training and testing data are captured from completely distinct areas. We attribute this deficiency to the lack of ability to extract the geometric layout of visual features and models' overfitting to low-level details. Our preliminary work (Zhang et al. 2022) introduced a Geometric Layout Extractor (GLE) to capture the geometric layout from input features. However, the previous GLE does not fully exploit information in the input feature. In this work, we propose GeoDTR+ with an enhanced GLE module that better models the correlations among visual features. To fully explore the LS techniques from our preliminary work, we further propose Contrastive Hard Samples Generation (CHSG) to facilitate model training. Extensive experiments show that GeoDTR+ achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in cross-area evaluation on CVUSA (Workman et al. 2015), CVACT (Liu and Li, 2019), and VIGOR (Zhu et al. 2021) by a large margin (16.44%, 22.71%, and 13.66% without polar transformation) while keeping the same-area performance comparable to existing SOTA. Moreover, we provide detailed analyses of GeoDTR+.
ISSN:0162-8828
1939-3539
1939-3539
2160-9292
DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3443652