Simulation and Experiment Study of Modular X-Band Phase-Locking Magnetron

The conventional mutual coupling phase-locking technique uses waveguides to directly connect magnetrons to operate as a whole device. However, this method is not suitable for large-scale phase-locked array applications due to the considerable challenges in achieving the required vacuum level. Thus,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electron devices 2024-07, Vol.71 (7), p.4342-4346
Hauptverfasser: Qin, Yu, Bi, Liangjie, Yin, Yong, Liu, Haixia, Song, Minsheng, Cui, Pan, Zhang, Xiaolian, Li, Hailong, Wang, Bin, Guo, Rui, Shen, Dagui, Meng, Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The conventional mutual coupling phase-locking technique uses waveguides to directly connect magnetrons to operate as a whole device. However, this method is not suitable for large-scale phase-locked array applications due to the considerable challenges in achieving the required vacuum level. Thus, the modular magnetron applied to the mutual coupling phase-locking technique was proposed. First, the coupling structure was designed to combine a double-ridged waveguide and a rectangular waveguide for incorporating an RF window. Therefore, a single magnetron could be vacuumed as a modular unit. Subsequently, in simulation, two modular X-band magnetrons connected by a coupling bridge were verified to operate in a phase-locked state with a 0° phase difference, with a phase-locking efficiency of 97.2%. Second, an experimental scheme capable of characterizing directly the phase difference between magnetrons was proposed. In the experiment, multiple sets of time-domain signal data were randomly sampled when the magnetrons were in a stable operating state. The experimental results were essentially consistent with the expected design phase difference of 0°, as the phase difference between the two magnetrons remained consistently between 3° and 5°, with the phase-locking efficiency measured at 91.9%.
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/TED.2024.3405399