A Novel Experimental Testing Setup and Calibration Procedures for Cylindrical Cell Thermal Models
Lumped-parameter thermal models are commonly used to estimate the thermal behavior of Li-ion battery cells in several applications because of their low computation effort. In this regard, it is important to plan a proper calibration procedure able to accurately assess the cell's thermal propert...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2023-01, Vol.11, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lumped-parameter thermal models are commonly used to estimate the thermal behavior of Li-ion battery cells in several applications because of their low computation effort. In this regard, it is important to plan a proper calibration procedure able to accurately assess the cell's thermal properties. While literature presents several methodologies with different levels of accuracy and complexity, there is a lack of a systematic approach and methodology. Furthermore, only a few works take into account the heat lost through the cell holder by conduction. In this work, a re-designed cell holder is introduced to minimize its thermal interaction with the cell during testing, then it provides a better understanding of thermal models calibration by comparing two simple, but effective, testing procedures. The specific heat capacity of a cylindrical cell is evaluated by carrying out two testing procedures in which heat flow direction is inverted. In the first procedure, heat is actively generated from the cell, while in the second procedure it is externally provided using a flexible polyimide heater. This has led to two different formulations of the energy balance equation that differ from the internal thermal dissipation modeling. At the end, a validation has been carried out implementing a current profile generated from the UDDS drive cycle. Both formulations have shown to have the similar temperature prediction with a RMSE of ~0.484 °C. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3285814 |