Reliability and Performance Evaluation of Safety-Critical Instrumentation and Control Systems of Nuclear Power Plant

Instrumentation and control systems are nervous systems of nuclear power plant (NPP). These systems interact with several safety-critical components of the NPP, such as actuators, transformers, control valves, sensors, circuit breakers, signal processing units, controllers, and heat exchangers. Ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on reliability 2024-03, Vol.73 (1), p.422-437
Hauptverfasser: Jyotish, Nand Kumar, Singh, Lalit Kumar, Kumar, Chiranjeev, Singh, Pooja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Instrumentation and control systems are nervous systems of nuclear power plant (NPP). These systems interact with several safety-critical components of the NPP, such as actuators, transformers, control valves, sensors, circuit breakers, signal processing units, controllers, and heat exchangers. Therefore, the failure of these systems could result in significant financial loss, harm to human resources, or environmental damage. As a result, these systems need to be highly reliable and accurate. In this article, we suggest a framework, based on the batch deterministic and stochastic Petri nets (BDSPNs) to measure the reliability and performance of safety-critical system. The framework consists of three phases. In the first phase, the system is modeled using the BDSPN to derive the transition rate among the system states. In phase 2, the transition rate matrix is utilized to compute the steady-state probability values, which help to evaluate the response time of the system using Little's law. The third phase uses a transition probability matrix to assess the reliability of the system. The technique is illustrated on shutdown system of NPP and is validated on the operational profile data. The obtained accuracy of 99.9905% in measurement of reliability validates the approach.
ISSN:0018-9529
1558-1721
DOI:10.1109/TR.2023.3270314