Diagnostic Yield of Molecular Karyotyping of Idiopathic Intellectual Disability Patients Ended with One Causative Anomaly; Duplication 9q34 Syndrome
Objective: Clinical application of sequence comparative genomic hybridization has greatly contributed to the diagnosis of patients with multiple congenital anomalies, syndromic or non-syndromic intellectual disability. The idiopathic intellectual disability patients with normal karyotype and/or norm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gazi tıp dergisi 2019-01, Vol.30 (3), p.352-357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Clinical application of sequence comparative genomic hybridization
has greatly contributed to the diagnosis of patients with multiple congenital
anomalies, syndromic or non-syndromic intellectual disability. The idiopathic
intellectual disability patients with normal karyotype and/or normal
subtelomeric rearrangement analysis via Fluorescence in situ Hybridization
(FISH), using genome-wide microarray platforms have detected chromosome
abnormalities in up to 12% of cases. In this study, we aimed that evaluate the
etiology of 9 patients with idiopathic intellectual disability and congenital
malformations or dysmorphic features.
Methods: We performed genom wide SNP 2.7 array, in the evaluation of 9
patients with idiopathic intellectual disability and congenital malformations or
dysmorphic features as well as normal karyotype and normal subtelomeric
rearrangement analysis by the usage of FISH technique.
Results: As a causative anomaly, a 2.6 Mb microduplication on 9q34.2-q34.3
was observed only in one patient who has idiopathic mental retardation and
multiple skeletal anomalies.
Conclusion: Microarray technology is a highly diagnostic method that is
recommended for individuals with intellectual disability and multiple
congenital anomalies. Microarray analysis revealed a causal anomaly in one of
nine patients (11%) consistent with the literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2147-2092 2147-2092 |
DOI: | 10.12996/gmj.2019.64 |