Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Next Generation Sequencing and Microarray Resequencing Methods for Detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations
Objective: Breast cancer constitutes 29 % of estimated new cases of cancer in women, and it is also one of the major cause of death in all cancer types. In this study, DNA samples of familial breast cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations which had been analyzed using conventional DNA sequenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gazi tıp dergisi 2018-01, Vol.29 (2), p.116-118 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Breast cancer constitutes 29 % of estimated new cases of cancer in
women, and it is also one of the major cause of death in all cancer types. In
this study, DNA samples of familial breast cancer patients with BRCA1 and
BRCA2 mutations which had been analyzed using conventional DNA
sequencing method, were also analyzed with new methods including
microarray and next generation sequencing (NGS) in order to compare their
results
Methods: Seven patients with BRCA1 mutation, one patient with BRCA2
mutation, and two controls were included. All samples for the microarray
method were studied on the GeneChip 3000 Scanner (Affymetrix) system and
then analyzed on the Affymetrix GeneChip Resequencing Analysis Software
(GSEQ® v4.0) system. Four patients from the patient group were selected for
next generation sequencing and were analyzed on GS Junior 454 (Roche,
Prague, Czech Republic) system. The raw data had been analysed by SeqPilot
SeqNext module (v4.0, JSI medical systems, Kippenheim, Germany).
Results: Microarray resequencing analysis did not detect the mutations
defined by conventional sequencing in patients, but mutations were detected
in all of the 4 patients in the next generation sequencing.
Conclusion: Our study detected the NGS to be reliable as conventional DNA
sequencing for studying BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. However, we suggest
to confirm the NGS results with a conventional method because of
homopolymer sequences which may cause false positive results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2147-2092 2147-2092 |
DOI: | 10.12996/gmj.2018.32 |