Three-dimensional Isotropic Shoulder MR Arthrography: Comparison with Two-dimensional MR Arthrography for the Diagnosis of Labral Lesions at 3.0 T1
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) isotropic magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography with two-dimensional (2D) MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions of the shoulder performed by using a 3.0-T imager. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board appr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2009-02, Vol.250 (2), p.498 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) isotropic magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography with two-dimensional
(2D) MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions of the shoulder performed by using a 3.0-T imager.
Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was given for this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. From March 2006
to January 2007, 100 patients underwent 3D isotropic and 2D MR shoulder arthrographic imaging by using a 3.0-T imager and
subsequent arthroscopic surgery. The 3D isotropic sequences were performed by using fast gradient-echo imaging with fat suppression
(voxel size, 0.6 Ã 0.6 Ã 0.6 mm; imaging time, 5 minutes 32 seconds) and were evaluated for the presence of superior, anterior,
and posterior labral lesions by using 3D isotropic and 2D MR arthrography. The statistical differences between the sensitivity
and specificity for both methods were analyzed by using the McNemar test, with arthroscopic findings regarded as reference
standard.
Results: Surgical findings confirmed 53 superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions, 17 anterior labral lesions, and five posterior
labral lesions. Respective sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 96% for SLAP lesions, 100% and 98% for anterior labral
lesions, and 80% and 99% for posterior labral lesions by using 2D MR arthrography and 83% and 96% for SLAP lesions, 100% and
96% for anterior labral lesions, and 80% and 99% for posterior labral lesions by using 3D isotropic MR arthrography. There
was no significant difference in sensitivities and specificities of both methods; however, the power of this study was limited
and larger comparison is needed.
Conclusion: Isotropic 3D shoulder MR arthrography combined with a multiplanar reconstruction technique can help in the diagnosis of shoulder
labral lesions as does 2D MR arthrography, but with shorter imaging times.
© RSNA, 2008 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2493071548 |