Pulmonary Nodule Volume: Effects of Reconstruction Parameters on Automated MeasurementsâA Phantom Study1
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate in a phantom the effects of reconstruction kernel, field of view (FOV), and section thickness on automated measurements of pulmonary nodule volume. Materials and Methods: Spherical and lobulated pulmonary nodules 3â15 mm in diameter were placed in a commercially...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2008-05, Vol.247 (2), p.400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: To prospectively evaluate in a phantom the effects of reconstruction kernel, field of view (FOV), and section thickness on
automated measurements of pulmonary nodule volume.
Materials and Methods: Spherical and lobulated pulmonary nodules 3â15 mm in diameter were placed in a commercially available lung phantom and scanned
by using a 16-section computed tomographic (CT) scanner. Nodule volume (V) was determined by using the diameters of 27 spherical nodules and the mass and density values of 29 lobulated nodules measured
by using the formulas V = (4/3)Ï r 3 (spherical nodules) and V = 1000 · ( M / D ) (lobulated nodules) as reference standards, where r is nodule radius; M, nodule mass; and D, wax density. Experiments were performed to evaluate seven reconstruction kernels and the independent effects of FOV and section
thickness. Automated nodule volume measurements were performed by using computer-assisted volume measurement software. General
linear regression models were used to examine the independent effects of each parameter, with percentage overestimation of
volume as the dependent variable of interest.
Results: There was no substantial difference in the accuracy of volume estimations across the seven reconstruction kernels. The bone
reconstruction kernel was deemed optimal on the basis of the results of a series of statistical analyses and other qualitative
findings. Overall, volume accuracy was significantly associated ( P < .0001) with larger reference standardâmeasured nodule diameter. There was substantial overestimation of the volumes of
the 3â5-mm nodules measured by using the volume measurement software. Decreasing the FOV facilitated no significant improvement
in the precision of lobulated nodule volume measurements. The accuracy of volume estimationsâparticularly those for small
nodulesâwas significantly ( P < .0001) affected by section thickness.
Conclusion: Substantial, highly variable overestimation of volume occurs with decreasing nodule diameter. A section thickness that enables
the acquisition of at least three measurements along the z-axis should be used to measure the volumes of larger pulmonary
nodules.
© RSNA, 2008 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2472070868 |