Flat-Panel Volume CT: Fundamental Principles, Technology, and Applications1
Flat-panel volume computed tomography (CT) systems have an innovative design that allows coverage of a large volume per rotation, fluoroscopic and dynamic imaging, and high spatial resolution that permits visualization of complex human anatomy such as fine temporal bone structures and trabecular bon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiographics 2008-11, Vol.28 (7), p.2009 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Flat-panel volume computed tomography (CT) systems have an innovative design that allows coverage of a large volume per rotation,
fluoroscopic and dynamic imaging, and high spatial resolution that permits visualization of complex human anatomy such as
fine temporal bone structures and trabecular bone architecture. In simple terms, flat-panel volume CT scanners can be thought
of as conventional multidetector CT scanners in which the detector rows have been replaced by an area detector. The flat-panel
detector has wide z-axis coverage that enables imaging of entire organs in one axial acquisition. Its fluoroscopic and angiographic
capabilities are useful for intraoperative and vascular applications. Furthermore, the high-volume coverage and continuous
rotation of the detector may enable depiction of dynamic processes such as coronary blood flow and whole-brain perfusion.
Other applications in which flat-panel volume CT may play a role include small-animal imaging, nondestructive testing in animal
survival surgeries, and tissue-engineering experiments. Such versatility has led some to predict that flat-panel volume CT
will gain importance in interventional and intraoperative applications, especially in specialties such as cardiac imaging,
interventional neuroradiology, orthopedics, and otolaryngology. However, the contrast resolution of flat-panel volume CT is
slightly inferior to that of multidetector CT, a higher radiation dose is needed to achieve a comparable signal-to-noise ratio,
and a slower scintillator results in a longer scanning time.
© RSNA, 2008 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0271-5333 1527-1323 |
DOI: | 10.1148/rg.287085004 |