Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Portography1
Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) portography with contrast material enhancement is a fast means of evaluating the portal venous system that has some advantages over currently used modalities, such as digital subtraction angiography, helical computed tomography, ultrasonography, and non...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiographics 1999-07, Vol.19 (4), p.973 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) portography with contrast material enhancement is a fast means of evaluating
the portal venous system that has some advantages over currently used modalities, such as digital subtraction angiography,
helical computed tomography, ultrasonography, and nonenhanced MR angiography with time-of-flight and phase-contrast techniques.
With contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography, a first-pass study of the mesenteric vasculature is performed after rapid bolus
injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine; a 3D fast field echo sequence is used, which can demonstrate the intrahepatic and
extrahepatic portal venous system clearly. Repeated sequences after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine allow separate
demonstration of the splanchnic arteries and portomesenteric veins. The images are reconstructed by means of maximum-intensity
projection postprocessing, and a subtraction technique can be used to eliminate arterial enhancement and demonstrate portosystemic
shunts. The coronal source images simultaneously demonstrate parenchymal lesions of the liver, pancreas, biliary tract, and
spleen. This technique is clinically indicated in portosystemic shunt, portal vein thrombosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatobiliary
tumor, hepatic vein obstruction, differentiation of splanchnic arterial from portal venous disease, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Its limitations include allergic reactions to contrast media, inappropriate positioning of the 3D acquisition slab, respiratory
motion artifacts, and pseudodissection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0271-5333 1527-1323 |