Natural antisense transcripts: sound or silence?

1 Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom; and 2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) EMI-U 0110, Institut des Cordeliers, Paris, France Antisense RNA was a rather uncommon term in a physiology environme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiological genomics 2005-10, Vol.23 (2), p.125-131
Hauptverfasser: Werner, Andreas, Berdal, Ariane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom; and 2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) EMI-U 0110, Institut des Cordeliers, Paris, France Antisense RNA was a rather uncommon term in a physiology environment until short interfering RNAs emerged as the tool of choice to knock down the expression of specific genes. As a consequence, the concept of RNA having regulatory potential became widely accepted. Yet, there is more to come. Computational studies suggest that between 15 and 25% of mammalian genes overlap, giving rise to pairs of sense and antisense RNAs. The resulting transcripts potentially interfere with each other’s processing, thus representing examples of RNA-mediated gene regulation by endogenous, naturally occurring antisense transcripts. Concerns that the large-scale antisense transcription may represent transcriptional noise rather than a gene regulatory mechanism are strongly opposed by recent reports. A relatively small, well-defined group of antisense or noncoding transcripts is linked to monoallelic gene expression as observed in genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, and clonal expression of B and T leukocytes. For the remaining, much larger group of bidirectionally transcribed genes, however, the physiological consequences of antisense transcription as well as the cellular mechanism(s) involved remain largely speculative. overlapping genes; gene regulation; epigenetics
ISSN:1094-8341
1531-2267
DOI:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00124.2005