Interaction between center and surround in rabbit retinal ganglion cells
D. K. Merwine, F. R. Amthor and N. M. Grzywacz Department of Physiological Optics, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA. 1. The interaction between the center and surround mechanisms of a variety of rabbit retinal ganglion cell classes was examined in extracellular sin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1995-04, Vol.73 (4), p.1547-1567 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | D. K. Merwine, F. R. Amthor and N. M. Grzywacz
Department of Physiological Optics, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA.
1. The interaction between the center and surround mechanisms of a variety
of rabbit retinal ganglion cell classes was examined in extracellular
single-unit recordings in an isolated eyecup preparation. Ganglion cell
classes studied included on and off brisk sustained and transient, on and
off sluggish sustained and transient, on-off and on directionally
selective, orientationally selective, and large field units. The surround
effects observed were qualitatively similar in all these ganglion cell
classes. 2. The average response-versus-contrast functions for stimuli
within the ganglion cells' receptive-field centers were relatively linear
between threshold and saturation for all ganglion cell classes examined.
The major effect of surround stimulation on the center
response-versus-contrast function was a reduction in the slope of the
linear portion of the curve, rather than a downward, parallel shift of the
function. Stimulation of the surround had no systematically significant
effect on the contrast threshold for the center spot, and, when it did have
a significant effect, it sometimes decreased, rather than increased the
magnitude of threshold. 3. Step changes in surround contrast were most
effective when they were made simultaneously with step changes in the
center; surround inhibition decreased significantly when it preceded
stimulation of the center by > 100 ms and was generally ineffective when
preceding the center by > 500 ms. The decrease in the inhibitory effect
of surround stimulation was a monotonic function of delay between 0 and 500
ms. 4. Stimulation of the surround by step changes in the contrast of a
sine-wave grating annulus produced qualitatively similar results to those
obtained for pure luminance modulations. This suggests that the surround
mechanism observed in these experiments was not due to pure luminance
adaptation within the surround. The inhibitory effect of sine-wave gratings
in the surround decreased monotonically as a function of spatial frequency.
5. Stimulation with a spot and an annulus that were both entirely within
the ganglion cell's excitatory receptive-field center typically yielded
nonadditive summation at contrasts whose linear sum of responses were below
saturation. The effect of an annulus within the receptive-field center on
responses elicited by a central spot quan |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.1995.73.4.1547 |