Reticulospinal neurons with and without monosynaptic inputs from cerebellar nuclei

J. C. Eccles, R. A. Nicoll, W. F. Schwarz, H. Taborikova and T. J. Willey An account is given of the responses of 557 medial reticular neurons with axons projecting down the spinal cord. All 30 experiments were on decerebrated unanesthetized cats paralyzed by Flaxedil. Recording from single neurons was by extracellular glass microelectrodes. Identification was first by location (confirmed by subsequent histology) in the medial reticular nucleus of medulla or pons, and second by antidromic activation from cord stimulation at C2 and L2 segmental levels. Axonal conduction velocities were calculated from the latency differential between L2 and C2 antidromic responses, and were usually in the range of 90-140 m/s; but about 25% were slower, ranging down to 30 m/s. Stimulation by electrodes in the ipsilateral and contralateral fastigial nuclei differentiated reticulospinal neurons into two classes according to whether they did or did not receive monosynaptic inputs, the respective populations of fully investigated neurons being 270 and 174. The fastigioreticular neurons were distinguished by a higher background frequency with mean values of 28 as against 15/s. There were also significant diffences in both the excitatory and inhibitory responses to afferent volleys from forelimb and hindlimb nerves. Comparison of the respective latency histograms showed that the responses of neurons with a fastigial input had an excess of latencies in the ranges that can be correlated with the latency histograms observed for fastigial responses. Thus, there is evidence for the effectiveness of the fastigial input and so for the pathway with monosynaptic linkage: Purkinje cells of cerebellar vermis yields fastigial neurons yields medial reticular neurons projecting down the spinal cord. Adequate stimulation of cutaneous receptors by pad taps and air-jet stimulation of hairy skin in a disppointingly small action when compared with fastigical responses. Explanations of this deficiency are suggested. Another discrpancy from the fastigial responses is that the medial reticular neurons have much wider receptive fields with little discrimination between ipsilateral and contralateral and between forelimb and hindlimb. Stimulation of the ipsilateral tegmental tract was tested on 183 reticulospinal neurons, 112 being with fastigial inputs. In about half there was a powerful monosynaptic excitation, which would identify such neurons as being on the pathway from mesencephalic and diencephalic