Endothelium-derived NO stimulates pressure-dependent renin release in conscious dogs
P. B. Persson, J. E. Baumann, H. Ehmke, E. Hackenthal, H. R. Kirchheim and B. Nafz I. Physiologisches Institut, Universitat Heidelberg, Germany. The effect of blocking the formation of endothelium-derived relaxing factor/nitric oxide (EDNO) on pressure-dependent renin release (RR) was studied in six...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Renal physiology 1993-06, Vol.264 (6), p.943-F947 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | P. B. Persson, J. E. Baumann, H. Ehmke, E. Hackenthal, H. R. Kirchheim and B. Nafz
I. Physiologisches Institut, Universitat Heidelberg, Germany.
The effect of blocking the formation of endothelium-derived relaxing
factor/nitric oxide (EDNO) on pressure-dependent renin release (RR) was
studied in six conscious foxhounds with chronically implanted catheters in
the abdominal aorta and the renal vein. Renal blood flow (RBF) was measured
with an ultrasonic transit-time flowmeter. RR was determined by multiplying
the renal venous-arterial plasma renin activity difference with renal
plasma flow. Renal artery pressure (RAP) was reduced in steps by a
pneumatic occluder placed around the suprarenal abdominal aorta. A dose of
1,000 mg NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was given as a bolus to
inhibit EDNO formation. In response to L-NAME, RAP increased (98 +/- 3 vs.
128 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.05), heart rate decreased (88 +/- 7 vs. 51 +/- 5
beats/min; P < 0.05), RBF decreased (280 +/- 19 vs. 185 +/- 24 ml/min; P
< 0.05), and RR decreased (62 +/- 11 vs. 28 +/- 7 U; P < 0.05),
whereas glomerular filtration rate changed little (38 +/- 3 vs. 35 +/- 4
ml/min; not significant). Below roughly 90 mmHg, RR was considerably
attenuated by L-NAME as RAP was reduced in steps. At the lowest RAP (50
mmHg) RR was 1,946 +/- 406 U during control vs. 697 +/- 179 U after L-NAME
(P < 0.05). Thus L-NAME inhibited pressure-dependent RR. This was
especially pronounced in the low-pressure range. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-6127 0002-9513 1931-857X 2161-1157 1522-1466 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajprenal.1993.264.6.F943 |