Increase in intake with sham feeding experience is concentration dependent
Department of Psychiatry, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the Edward W. Bourne Laboratory, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Westchester Division, White Plains, New York 10605 Most sham feeding studies show that about three sham feeding tests are required for intake...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 1999-08, Vol.277 (2), p.565-R571 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Department of Psychiatry, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College
of Cornell University and the Edward W. Bourne Laboratory, New York
Presbyterian Hospital, Westchester Division, White Plains, New York
10605
Most sham
feeding studies show that about three sham feeding tests are required
for intake to reach maximum. One study, however, using a dilute
solution, reported maximum sham intake in the first sham feeding test,
suggesting that the progressive rise in sham intake may be
concentration dependent. We tested this hypothesis with six groups of
rats given five sham feeding tests each with one of six concentrations
of sweetened condensed milk (0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, 16:1,
water-to-milk dilutions). It took three sham tests for intake to reach
maximum with the three most concentrated solutions, but only one with
the three weakest. Thus the intake of concentrated solutions of milk is
limited by two negative feedback signals, one derived from the
accumulation of fluid in the gastrointestinal tract, the other from a
labile signal that loses its effectiveness with sham feeding
experience. In contrast, the intake of weak concentrations is limited
only by the nonlabile negative feedback signal because the labile
signal is missing.
food intake; postingestional control; orosensory control; unconditioned negative feedback; conditioned negative feedback |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-6119 0002-9513 1522-1490 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.2.r565 |