Circadian characteristics of Djungarian hamsters: effects of photoperiodic pretreatment and artificial selection

W. Puchalski and G. R. Lynch Department of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459-0170. Bidirectional artificial selection for (High Line) and against (Low Line) photoresponsiveness altered the percent of photoresponsive hamsters within lines and affected circadian function of h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 1991-09, Vol.261 (3), p.670-R676
Hauptverfasser: Puchalski, W, Lynch, G. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:W. Puchalski and G. R. Lynch Department of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459-0170. Bidirectional artificial selection for (High Line) and against (Low Line) photoresponsiveness altered the percent of photoresponsive hamsters within lines and affected circadian function of hamsters identical in photoresponsiveness. For example, free-running period was shorter in responsive relative to nonresponsive hamsters. Between-line differences for responders and nonresponders were also found: hamsters from the High Line had a shorter free-running period relative to Low Line hamsters. However, phase angle of entrainment to long and short days was not affected. In general, expression of circadian rhythmicity was extraordinarily inflexible in photononresponsive hamsters from both lines: 1) phase angle of entrainment to lights on was similar under short and long day; 2) activity duration was similar under long and short days, although some decompression occurred in constant dark; 3) aftereffects on the free-running period were absent; and 4) amplitude of the phase-response curve was small (+/- 1 h) and present only at circadian times 10-24. We propose that selection for or against photoresponsiveness may have affected the interaction of component oscillators underlying circadian rhythmicity.
ISSN:0363-6119
0002-9513
1522-1490
DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.1991.261.3.R670