LPS-induced bronchial hyperreactivity: interference by mIL-10 differs according to site of delivery
1 Unité Mixte de Recherche 7001 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Ecole Nationale de Chimie de Paris/Aventis PharmaGencell Société Anonyme, 94403 Vitry-sur-Seine Cedex, and 2 Unité de Pharmacologie CellulaireInstitut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France Submitted 25 February 2003 ; accepted in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology 2004-01, Vol.286 (1), p.98-L105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Unité Mixte de Recherche 7001 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Ecole Nationale de Chimie de Paris/Aventis PharmaGencell Société Anonyme, 94403 Vitry-sur-Seine Cedex, and 2 Unité de Pharmacologie CellulaireInstitut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
Submitted 25 February 2003
; accepted in final form 9 September 2003
When administered to mice systemically or via the airways, LPS induces bronchoconstriction (BC) and/or bronchopulmonary hyperreactivity (BHR), associated with inflammation. Accordingly, a relationship between inflammation and allergic and nonallergic BHR can be hypothesized. We therefore studied the interference of the anti-inflammatory cytokine murine IL-10 (mIL-10) with LPS-induced lung inflammation, BC, and BHR. mIL-10 was administered directly into the airways by intranasal instillation or generated in vivo after muscle electrotransfer of mIL-10-encoding plasmid. Electrotransfer led to high mIL-10 circulating levels for a longer time than after the injection of recombinant mIL-10 (rmIL-10). rmIL-10 administered intranasally reduced lung inflammation and BHR after LPS administration into airways. It also reduced the ex vivo production of TNF- by LPS-stimulated lung tissue explants. Two days after electrotransfer, mIL-10 blood levels were elevated, but lung inflammation, BC, and BHR persisted unaffected. Blood mIL-10 reaches the airways poorly, which probably accounts for the ineffectiveness of mIL-10-encoding plasmid electrotransfer. When LPS was aerosolized 15 days after electrotransfer, lung inflammation persisted but BHR was significantly reduced, an effect that may be related to the longer exposure of the relevant cells to mIL-10. The dissociation between inflammation and BHR indicates that both are not directly correlated. In conclusion, this study shows that mIL-10 is efficient against BHR when present in the airway compartment. Despite this, the muscle electrotransfer with mIL-10-encoding plasmid showed a protective effect against BHR after a delay of 2 wk that should be further investigated.
murine interleukin-10; gene transfer; gene therapy; electroporation; lipopolysaccharide; lung inflammation
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. F. Bureau, Unité de Pharmacologie Chimique et Génétique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique FRE 2463, Faculté de Pharmacie, 4 av de l'Observatoire, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France (E-mail: Michel-Francis.Bureau{at}univ-paris5.fr ). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1040-0605 1522-1504 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajplung.00053.2003 |