Assessment of LV systolic function in atrial fibrillation using an index of preceding cardiac cycles
Sections of 1 Cardiovascular Imaging and 2 Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 The clinical assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function during atrial fibrillation (AF) is unreliable and difficult because of beat-to-beat variabil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2001-08, Vol.281 (2), p.H573-H580 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sections of 1 Cardiovascular Imaging and
2 Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland
Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
The clinical assessment
of left ventricular (LV) systolic function during atrial fibrillation
(AF) is unreliable and difficult because of beat-to-beat variability.
We evaluated an index for the estimation of LV systolic function in AF
that is based on the relationship between the preceding
(R-R 1 ) and prepreceding (R-R 2 ) R-R intervals.
LV Doppler stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), peak aortic flow
rate (AoF) and the maximum value of the first derivative of the LV
pressure curve (dP/d t max ) were evaluated in 13 healthy open-chest dogs during triggered AF. All parameters showed a
significantly strong positive linear relationship with the ratio of
R-R 1 /R-R 2 ( r = 0.65, 0.74, 0.75, and 0.70 for SV, EF, AoF, and dP/d t max ,
respectively). The calculated value of LV systolic parameters at
R-R 1 /R-R 2 = 1 in the linear regression line showed a good relationship and an agreement with the measured average value of the parameter over all cardiac cycles (SV, 12.1 vs.
12.8 ml; EF, 49.6 vs. 51.2%; AoF, 1.37 vs. 1.48 l/min; and dP/d t max , 2,323 vs. 2,454 mmHg/s). Using the LV
systolic parameters estimated at R-R 1 /R-R 2 = 1 in the linear regression line allows the LV contractile function to
be accurately and reproducibly evaluated during AF and obviates the
less-reliable process of averaging multiple cardiac cycles.
preload; afterload; contractility; R-R interval; echocardiography; left ventricular |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-6135 1522-1539 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.2.h573 |