Methods for assessment of the rate of onset and offset of insulin action during nonsteady state in humans

P. C. Butler, A. Caumo, A. Zerman, P. C. O'Brien, C. Cobelli and R. A. Rizza Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. Measurement of glucose turnover under non-steady-state conditions has proven problematic. When the mass of the glucose pool is not changing (i.e., gluco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism 1993-04, Vol.264 (4), p.E548-E560
Hauptverfasser: Butler, P. C, Caumo, A, Zerman, A, O'Brien, P. C, Cobelli, C, Rizza, R. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:P. C. Butler, A. Caumo, A. Zerman, P. C. O'Brien, C. Cobelli and R. A. Rizza Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. Measurement of glucose turnover under non-steady-state conditions has proven problematic. When the mass of the glucose pool is not changing (i.e., glucose concentrations are constant) non-steady-state error can be minimized if all glucose entering the circulation has the same specific activity as plasma [radioactive infused glucose (hot-GINF) method]. Alternatively, a second tracer can be used to measure the effective volume of glucose [variable-pV method of Issekutz (T. Issekutz, R. Issekutz, and D. Elahi. (Can. J. Physiol. 52:215-224, 1974)]. To determine whether these techniques provide concordant assessments of insulin action under non-steady-state conditions, glucose turnover was measured in six subjects. After initiation of insulin (0.6 mU.kg-1 x min-1), both methods indicated similar rates of suppression of hepatic glucose release, which was complete by approximately 100-120 min. In contrast, the traditional fixed-pV method of Steele (R. Steele, J. Wall, R. DeBodo, and N. Altszuler. Am. J. Physiol. 187:15-24 1956) underestimated turnover (P < 0.01) resulting in apparent complete suppression of glucose release within approximately 40 min (P < 0.01 vs. other methods). The hot-GINF and variable-pV methods also yielded similar estimates of turnover after discontinuation of insulin. Both indicated that resumption of hepatic glucose release was slower (P < 0.01) and fall of glucose uptake faster (P < 0.01) than suggested by the fixed-pV method. Thus both the hot-GINF and variable-pV methods avoid non-steady-state error introduced by the fixed-pV method and provide concordant assessments of the rate of onset and offset of insulin action.
ISSN:0193-1849
0002-9513
1522-1555
DOI:10.1152/ajpendo.1993.264.4.E548