In vivo studies on paracrine actions of pituitary angiotensin II in stimulating prolactin release in rats

M. K. Steele and L. S. Myers Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0444. The present experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that, in vivo, intrapituitary angiotensin II (ANG II) mediates the effect of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) on prolac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism 1990-04, Vol.258 (4), p.E619-E624
Hauptverfasser: Steele, M. K, Myers, L. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:M. K. Steele and L. S. Myers Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0444. The present experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that, in vivo, intrapituitary angiotensin II (ANG II) mediates the effect of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) on prolactin release. After intravenous administration of LHRH (100 ng/100 microliters saline), plasma levels of both luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin were increased in ovariectomized rats pretreated with estradiol and progesterone. Intravenous administration of saralasin or sarthran (ANG II receptor blockers) reduced or abolished, respectively, the LHRH-induced increase in prolactin without affecting the rise in LH. In other ovariectomized steroid-treated rats, saralasin did not affect the increase in LH or prolactin induced by 10 min of restraint stress. Finally, in intact female rats on the day of proestrus, neither saralasin nor sarthran affected the mid-cycle prolactin surge. Taken together, these results show that in vivo exogenous LHRH stimulates prolactin release via a paracrine action of pituitary ANG II. However, under other conditions in which both LH and prolactin (and presumably endogenous LHRH) are elevated, pituitary ANG II does not appear to be involved in the prolactin rise.
ISSN:0193-1849
0002-9513
1522-1555
DOI:10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.4.e619