Underestimation of hepatic glucose production by radioactive and stable tracers
G. M. Argoud, D. S. Schade and R. P. Eaton Although negative hepatic glucose production rates are physiologically impossible, they have been observed when hepatic glucose production is measured with the tracer-dilution technique during the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic glucose clamp. Because hepatic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism 1987-05, Vol.252 (5), p.E606-E615 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | G. M. Argoud, D. S. Schade and R. P. Eaton
Although negative hepatic glucose production rates are physiologically
impossible, they have been observed when hepatic glucose production is
measured with the tracer-dilution technique during the hyperinsulinemic,
euglycemic glucose clamp. Because hepatic glucose production is determined
from the difference between tracer-derived glucose disposal and the known
exogenous glucose infusion rate, the negative values for hepatic glucose
production must result from an underestimation of glucose disposal by the
tracer technique. In the current investigation, tracer-derived glucose
disposal was measured in 25 subjects undergoing hyperinsulinemic,
euglycemic clamps. Glucose disposal was measured with both radioactive and
stable isotopes that utilize different methodologies, to determine whether
discriminant metabolism of the isotopes versus methodological error leads
to underestimation of tracer-derived glucose disposal. Both the radioactive
and stable methodologies underestimated the exogenous glucose infusion rate
during the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp by 27 and 17%, respectively.
Mean hepatic glucose production was -2.1 +/- 0.2 and -1.3 +/- 0.2 mg X kg-1
X min-1 as determined by the radioactive and stable isotope methodologies,
respectively. Methodological error was an unlikely cause of this
underestimation because it occurred with two different methodologies. The
most likely explanation for underestimated rates of glucose disposal
determined by the two types of isotope methodologies is discrepant
metabolism of glucose tracers in comparison with unlabeled glucose. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0193-1849 0002-9513 1522-1555 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajpendo.1987.252.5.E606 |