A Retinoic Acid Receptor β/γ-Selective Prodrug (tazarotene) Plus a Retinoid X Receptor Ligand Induces Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation, Retinoblastoma Hypophosphorylation, G0 Arrest, and Cell Differentiation
Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)β is perceived to function as a tumor suppressor gene in various contexts where its absence is associated with tumorigenicity and its presence causes cell cycle arrest. Tazarotene is a prodrug selective for RARβ/γ, thereby motivating interest in determining whether taz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular pharmacology 2004-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)β is perceived to function as a tumor suppressor gene in various contexts where its absence is
associated with tumorigenicity and its presence causes cell cycle arrest. Tazarotene is a prodrug selective for RARβ/γ, thereby
motivating interest in determining whether tazarotene might activate putative tumor suppressor activity. Using HL-60 human
myeloblastic leukemia cells, a cell line that undergoes G 0 cell cycle arrest and myeloid differentiation in response to retinoic acid (RA), tazarotene failed to cause extracellular
signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, a requirement for retinoic acid (RA)-induced G 0 arrest and differentiation; retinoblastoma (RB) hypophosphorylation, another characteristic of RA-induced G 0 arrest and cell differentiation; G 0 arrest; or differentiation into mature myeloid cells. However, when used in combination with a retinoid X receptor (RXR)-selective
ligand, tazarotene caused ERK activation, RB tumor suppressor protein hypophosphorylation, G 0 arrest, and myeloid differentiation. The kinetics of G 0 arrest and differentiation was similar to that of RA. Dose-response studies showed that diminishing tazarotene progressively
diminished both induced cell differentiation and G 0 arrest, where the doses for cellular effects were consistent with the transcriptional transactivation data. For either tazarotene
or an RARα-selective ligand, diminishing the coadministered RXR-selective ligand diminished both induced differentiation and
G 0 arrest. Tazarotene could propel either early or late portions of the period leading to differentiation and G 0 arrest and was interchangeable with an RARα-selective ligand. Tazarotene used with RXR-selective ligand may thus be a useful
antineoplastic agent in differentiation induction therapy as exemplified by the prototypical RA treatment of acute promyelocytic
leukemia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-895X 1521-0111 |
DOI: | 10.1124/mol.104.003475 |