Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group
Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group. E J Bastyr, 3rd , C A Stuart , R G Brodows , S Schwartz , C J Graf , A Zagar and K E Robertson Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2000-09, Vol.23 (9), p.1236-1241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group.
E J Bastyr, 3rd ,
C A Stuart ,
R G Brodows ,
S Schwartz ,
C J Graf ,
A Zagar and
K E Robertson
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA. ejbIII@lilly.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the overall efficacy of combination therapies focused on fasting or postprandial blood glucose in patients
with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with oral sulfonylurea agents alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of
135 patients were randomly assigned for 3 months to 1 of 3 combination regimens with glyburide (G) that addressed postprandial
blood glucose with insulin lispro (L+G), premeal blood glucose with metformin (M+G), or fasting blood glucose (FBG) with bedtime
NPH insulin (NPH+G). RESULTS: At end point, HbA1c was significantly lower with all therapies (P = 0.001) and was significantly
lower for L+G (7.68+/-0.88%) compared with either NPH+G (8.51+/-1.38%, P = 0.003) or M+G (8.31+/-1.31%, P = 0.025). FBG at
end point was significantly lower for NPH+G (8.49+/-2.36 mmol/l) compared with either L+G (10.57+/-1.97 mmol/l, P = 0.001)
or M+G (9.69+/-2.89 mmol/l, P = 0.029). The mean 2-h postprandial glucose after a test meal was significantly lower for L+G
(10.87+/-2.88 mmol/l) versus NPH+G (12.21+/-3.12 mmol/, P = 0.052) or versus M+G (12.72+/-3.26 mmol/l, P = 0.009). The overall
rate of hypoglycemia (episodes per 30 days) was low and not statistically significant between groups (P = 0.156). CONCLUSIONS:
Adding a second antihyperglycemic agent, regardless of its timing of action, lowers HbA1c and glucose values. However, when
insulin lispro was used to focus on postprandial blood glucose, there was a greater impact on overall metabolic control. These
data support the importance of lowering postprandial blood glucose to optimize overall glycemic control and thus improve long-term
outcomes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1236 |