Comparative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of c-myc Amplificationon Archival Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Materials

The oncogene c-myc is a key regulator of cell cycle progression (from G 1 to S phase). The amplification of c-myc can either induce cell proliferation or apoptosis. As a part of our ongoing effort to develop methods for multiple tumor marker analysis, this study was carried out to determine whether...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2000-02, Vol.9 (2), p.175
Hauptverfasser: JianYu Rao, Sophia K. Apple, YuShen Jin, Suhua Lin, Roberta K. Nieberg, Sharon L. Hirtschowitz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The oncogene c-myc is a key regulator of cell cycle progression (from G 1 to S phase). The amplification of c-myc can either induce cell proliferation or apoptosis. As a part of our ongoing effort to develop methods for multiple tumor marker analysis, this study was carried out to determine whether biomarkers such as c-myc amplification could be analyzed on genetic materials collected from archival fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears. A novel comparative PCR analysis was used to analyze c-myc amplification semiquantitatively. Genomic DNA was prepared using cells obtained from archival FNA materials that had undergone quantitative fluorescence image analysis (QFIA) for other biomarkers. Of the 72 cases selected from 1995 for this study, 53 had an adequate amount of DNA for analysis. A novel comparative PCR analysis was used to analyze c-myc amplification quantitatively. For each batch of experiments, DNA from the high c-myc expressing cells, HL-60, and DNA from the low expressing cells, K562, were served as positive and negative controls, respectively. c-myc amplification was observed in 16 (94.1%) of 17 malignant lesions, 5 (41.7%) of 12 proliferative breast diseases with nuclear atypia, and 4 (16.7%) of 24 other benign lesions (fibroadenoma or fibrocystic disease). The overall difference of c-myc expression among these groups was highly significant by χ 2 analysis ( P = 0.0002). We conclude that multiple phenotypic markers and genotypic markers may be combined in a risk assessment biomarker profile on small FNA samples that can be obtained on multiple occasions relatively noninvasively from the patient. The results of this study suggest that c-myc amplification may be a biomarker of breast cancer risk. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed to confirm the current observation.
ISSN:1055-9965
1538-7755