Comparative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of c-myc Amplificationon Archival Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Materials
The oncogene c-myc is a key regulator of cell cycle progression (from G 1 to S phase). The amplification of c-myc can either induce cell proliferation or apoptosis. As a part of our ongoing effort to develop methods for multiple tumor marker analysis, this study was carried out to determine whether...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2000-02, Vol.9 (2), p.175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The oncogene c-myc is a key regulator of cell cycle
progression (from G 1 to S phase). The amplification of
c-myc can either induce cell proliferation or apoptosis.
As a part of our ongoing effort to develop methods for multiple tumor
marker analysis, this study was carried out to determine whether
biomarkers such as c-myc amplification could be analyzed
on genetic materials collected from archival fine-needle aspiration
(FNA) smears. A novel comparative PCR analysis was used to analyze
c-myc amplification semiquantitatively. Genomic DNA was
prepared using cells obtained from archival FNA materials that had
undergone quantitative fluorescence image analysis (QFIA) for other
biomarkers. Of the 72 cases selected from 1995 for this study, 53 had
an adequate amount of DNA for analysis. A novel comparative PCR
analysis was used to analyze c-myc amplification
quantitatively. For each batch of experiments, DNA from the high
c-myc expressing cells, HL-60, and DNA from the low
expressing cells, K562, were served as positive and negative controls,
respectively. c-myc amplification was observed in 16
(94.1%) of 17 malignant lesions, 5 (41.7%) of 12 proliferative breast
diseases with nuclear atypia, and 4 (16.7%) of 24 other benign lesions
(fibroadenoma or fibrocystic disease). The overall difference of
c-myc expression among these groups was highly
significant by χ 2 analysis ( P =
0.0002). We conclude that multiple phenotypic markers and genotypic
markers may be combined in a risk assessment biomarker profile on small
FNA samples that can be obtained on multiple occasions relatively
noninvasively from the patient. The results of this study suggest that
c-myc amplification may be a biomarker of breast cancer
risk. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed to
confirm the current observation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |