A Chemical Switch Regulates Fibrate Specificity for Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α (PPARα) VersusLiver X Receptor

Fenofibrate is clinically successful in treating hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia presumably through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα)-dependent induction of genes that control fatty acid β-oxidation. Lipid homeostasis and cholesterol metabolism also are regulated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2003-01, Vol.278 (4), p.2403
Hauptverfasser: Jeffrey Thomas, Kelli S. Bramlett, Chahrzad Montrose, Patricia Foxworthy, Patrick I. Eacho, Denis McCann, Guoqing Cao, Anton Kiefer, Jeff McCowan, Kuo-long Yu, Timothy Grese, William W. Chin, Thomas P. Burris, Laura F. Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fenofibrate is clinically successful in treating hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia presumably through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα)-dependent induction of genes that control fatty acid β-oxidation. Lipid homeostasis and cholesterol metabolism also are regulated by the nuclear oxysterol receptors, liver X receptors α and β (LXRα and LXRβ). Here we show that fenofibrate ester, but not fenofibric acid, functions as an LXR antagonist by directly binding to LXRs. Likewise, ester forms, but not carboxylic acid forms, of other members of the fibrate class of molecules antagonize the LXRs. The fibrate esters display greater affinity for LXRs than the corresponding fibric acids have for PPARα. Thus, these two nuclear receptors display a degree of conservation in their recognition of ligands; yet, the acid/ester moiety acts as a chemical switch that determines PPARα versus LXR specificity. Consistent with its LXR antagonistic activity, fenofibrate potently represses LXR agonist-induced transcription of hepatic lipogenic genes. Surprisingly, fenofibrate does not repress LXR-induced transcription of various ATP-binding cassette transporters either in liver or in macrophages, suggesting that fenofibrate manifests variable biocharacter in the context of differing gene promoters. These findings provide not only an unexpected mechanism by which fenofibrate inhibits lipogenesis but also the basis for examination of the pharmacology of an LXR ligand in humans.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M209629200