Mechanistic Differences in the Activation of Estrogen Receptor-α (ERα)- and ERβ-dependent Gene Expression by cAMP Signaling Pathway(s)

Although increases in intracellular cAMP can stimulate estrogen receptor-α (ERα) activity in the absence of exogenous hormone, no studies have addressed whether ERβ can be similarly regulated. In transient transfections, forskolin plus 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which increases intracell...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2003-04, Vol.278 (15), p.12834
Hauptverfasser: Kevin M. Coleman, Martin Dutertre, Abeer El-Gharbawy, Brian G. Rowan, Nancy L. Weigel, Carolyn L. Smith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although increases in intracellular cAMP can stimulate estrogen receptor-α (ERα) activity in the absence of exogenous hormone, no studies have addressed whether ERβ can be similarly regulated. In transient transfections, forskolin plus 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which increases intracellular cAMP, stimulated the transcriptional activities of both ERα and ERβ. This effect was blocked by the protein kinase A inhibitor H89 ( N -(2-( p -bromocinnamylamino)-ethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide) and was dependent on an estrogen response element. A 12- O -tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response element (TRE) located 5′ to the estrogen response element was necessary for cAMP-dependent activation of gene expression by ERβ but not ERα, indicating that the former subtype requires a functional interaction with TRE-interacting factor(s) to stimulate transcription. Both p160 and CREB-binding protein coactivators stimulated cAMP-induced ERα and ERβ transcriptional activity. However, mutation of the two cAMP-inducible SRC-1 phosphorylation sites important for cAMP activation of chicken progesterone receptor or all seven known SRC-1 phosphorylation sites did not specifically impair cAMP activation of ERα. The E/F domains of ERα are sufficient for activation by forskolin/IBMX, and this is accompanied by an increase in receptor phosphorylation. In contrast, cAMP signaling reduces the phosphorylation of the corresponding region of ERβ, and this correlates with the lack of forskolin/IBMX stimulated transcriptional activity. Our data suggest that cAMP activation of ERα transcriptional activity is associated with receptor instead of SRC-1 phosphorylation. Moreover, differences in the cofactor requirements, domains of ERα and ERβ sufficient for forskolin/IBMX activation, and the effect of cAMP on receptor phosphorylation indicate that this signaling pathway utilizes distinct mechanisms to stimulate ERα and ERβ transcriptional activity.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M212312200