Keap1 loss promotes Kras-driven lung cancer and results in a dependence on glutaminolysis
Treating KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a major challenge in cancer treatment given the difficulties associated with directly inhibiting the KRAS oncoprotein1. One approach to addressing this challenge is to define frequently co-occurring mutations with KRAS, which themselves may lea...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Treating KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a major challenge in cancer treatment given the difficulties associated with directly inhibiting the KRAS oncoprotein1. One approach to addressing this challenge is to define frequently co-occurring mutations with KRAS, which themselves may lead to therapeutic vulnerabilities in tumors. Approximately 20% of KRAS-mutant LUAD tumors carry loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)2-4, a negative regulator of nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2 (NFE2L2; hereafter NRF2), which is the master transcriptional regulator of the endogenous antioxidant response5-10. The high frequency of mutations in KEAP1 suggests an important role for the oxidative stress response in lung tumorigenesis. Using a CRISPR/Cas9-based approach in a mouse model of Kras-driven LUAD we examined the effects of Keap1 loss in lung cancer progression. We show that loss of Keap1 hyper-activates Nrf2 and promotes Kras-driven LUAD. Combining CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic screening and metabolomic analyses, we show that Keap1/Nrf2-mutant cancers are dependent on increased glutaminolysis, and this property can be therapeutically exploited through the pharmacological inhibition of glutaminase. Finally, we provide a rationale for sub-stratification of human lung cancer patients with KRAS-KEAP1 or -NRF2-mutant tumors as likely to respond to glutaminase inhibition. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1038/nm.4407 |