Neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age after general and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy: a randomised controlled trial

Summary Background: There is pre-clinical evidence that general anaesthetics affect brain development. There is mixed evidence from cohort studies that young children exposed to anaesthesia may have an increased risk of poorer neurodevelopmental outcome. This trial aims to determine if GA in infancy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Davidson, Andrew J, Disma, Nicola, de Graaff, Jurgen C, Withington, Davinia E, Dorris, Liam, Bell, Graham, Stargatt, Robyn, Bellinger, David C, Schuster, Tibor, Arnup, Sarah J, Hardy, Pollyanna, Hunt, Rodney W, Takagi, Michael J, Giribaldi, Gaia, Hartmann, Penelope L, Salvo, Ida, Morton, Neil S, von Ungern Sternberg, Britta S, Locatelli, Bruno Guido, Wilton, Niall, Lynn, Anne, Thomas, Joss J, Polaner, David, Bagshaw, Oliver, Szmuk, Peter, Absalom, Anthony R, Frawley, Geoff, Berde, Charles, Ormond, Gillian D, Marmor, Jacki, Ellen, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background: There is pre-clinical evidence that general anaesthetics affect brain development. There is mixed evidence from cohort studies that young children exposed to anaesthesia may have an increased risk of poorer neurodevelopmental outcome. This trial aims to determine if GA in infancy has any impact on neurodevelopmental outcome. The primary outcome for the trial is neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age. The secondary outcome is neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age and is reported here. Methods: We performed an international assessor-masked randomised controlled equivalence trial in infants less than 60 weeks post-menstrual age, born at greater than 26 weeks gestational age having inguinal herniorrhaphy. Infants were excluded if they had existing risk factors for neurologic injury. Infants were randomly assigned to awake-regional (RA) or sevoflurane-based general anaesthesia (GA). Web-based randomisation was performed in blocks of two or four and stratified by site and gestational age at birth. The outcome for analysis was the composite cognitive score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. The analysis was as-per-protocol adjusted for gestational age at birth. A difference in means of five points (1/3 SD) was predefined as the clinical equivalence margin. The trial was registered at ANZCTR, ACTRN12606000441516 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00756600. Findings: Between February 2007, and January 2013, 363 infants were randomised to RA and 359 to GA. Outcome data were available for 238 in the RA and 294 in the GA arms. The median duration of anaesthesia in the GA arm was 54 minutes. For the cognitive composite score there was equivalence in means between arms (RA-GA: +0·169, 95% CI −2·30 to +2·64). Interpretation For this secondary outcome we found no evidence that just under an hour of sevoflurane anaesthesia in infancy increases the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age compared to RA.
ISSN:0140-6736
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00608-X