Prevention of Infections During Primary Immunodeficiency

Because infectious diseases are a major source of morbidity and mortality in the majority of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), the application of a prophylactic regimen is often necessary. However, because of the variety of PIDs and pathogens involved, and because evidence is scarce,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2014-11, Vol.59 (10), p.1462-1470
Hauptverfasser: Aguilar, Claire, Malphettes, Marion, Donadieu, Jean, Chandesris, Olivia, Coignard-Biehler, Hélène, Catherinot, Emilie, Pellier, Isabelle, Stephan, Jean-Louis, Le Moing, Vincent, Barlogis, Vincent, Suarez, Felipe, Gérart, Stéphane, Lanternier, Fanny, Jaccard, Arnaud, Consigny, Paul-Henri, Moulin, Florence, Launay, Odile, Lecuit, Marc, Hermine, Olivier, Oksenhendler, Eric, Picard, Capucine, Blanche, Stéphane, Fischer, Alain, Mahlaoui, Nizar, Lortholary, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Because infectious diseases are a major source of morbidity and mortality in the majority of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), the application of a prophylactic regimen is often necessary. However, because of the variety of PIDs and pathogens involved, and because evidence is scarce, practices are heterogeneous. To homogenize practices among centers, the French National Reference Center for PIDs aimed at elaborating recommendations for anti-infectious prophylaxis for the most common PIDs. We performed a literature review of infectious complications and prophylactic regimens associated with the most frequent PIDs. Then, a working group including different specialists systematically debated about chemoprophylaxis, immunotherapy, immunization, and recommendations for patients. Grading of prophylaxis was done using strength of recommendations (decreasing from A to D) and evidence level (decreasing from I to III). These might help infectious diseases specialists in the management of PIDs and improving the outcome of patients with PIDs.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciu646