Calibration of parent and fragment ion detection rates in Rosettas ROSINA/DFMS mass spectrometer

The Double Focusing Mass Spectrometer DFMS embarked on the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission as part of the ROSINA instrument suite. It boasts a high mass resolution and a high sensitivity, which have guaranteed spectacular discoveries during Rosetta’s rendez-vous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of mass spectrometry 2019-12, Vol.446 (December), p.116233, Article 116233
Hauptverfasser: De Keyser, J., Gibbons, A., Dhooghe, F., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Berthelier, J.-J., Fuselier, S.A., Gombosi, T.I., Neefs, E., Rubin, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Double Focusing Mass Spectrometer DFMS embarked on the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission as part of the ROSINA instrument suite. It boasts a high mass resolution and a high sensitivity, which have guaranteed spectacular discoveries during Rosetta’s rendez-vous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. This paper describes the DFMS data calibration procedure for determining the parent and fragment ion count rates in the neutral mode, which serve as the basis for retrieving the neutral gas densities. A new approach to computing secondary electron yields is presented. Attention is given to an analysis of the mass peak shapes, which change with magnet temperature. Discrete counting statistical effects also affect the peak shape at low counts. If not accounted for, changes of mass peak shape can induce errors of up to 20% on the determination of the ion fluxes. An assessment of the different sources of uncertainty on the obtained count rates and ratios of count rates is presented. [Display omitted] •The behaviour of the DFMS spectrometer on Rosetta depends on instrument temperature.•DFMS temperature affects the peak shape in neutral gas mass spectra.•Mass peak shapes can be different for species with low abundance.•Data interpretation must account for the varying peak shape.•A proper spectrometer characterisation provides the secondary electron yields.
ISSN:1387-3806
1873-2798
DOI:10.1016/j.ijms.2019.116233