Clinical factors associated with lithium response in bipolar disorders
Background: Bipolar disorder is a common chronic illness characterized by high levels of morbidity and all-cause mortality. Lithium is one of the gold standard mood stabilizer treatments, but the identification of good, partial and non-responders in clinical settings is inconsistent. Methods: We use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry 2017-05, Vol.51 (5), p.524-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Bipolar disorder is a common chronic illness characterized by high levels of morbidity
and all-cause mortality. Lithium is one of the gold standard mood stabilizer treatments,
but the identification of good, partial and non-responders in clinical settings is
inconsistent.
Methods:
We used an established rating scale (the Alda scale) to classify the degree of lithium
response (good response, partial response, non-response) in a large, multicentre
clinically representative sample of well-characterized cases of bipolar disorders I and
II. Next, we examined previously reported clinical predictors of response to determine
which factors significantly differentiated between the three response groups.
Results:
Of 754 cases, 300 received lithium, for at least 6 months, as a treatment for bipolar
disorder (40%). Of these cases, 17% were classified as good response, 52% as partial
response and 31% as non-response. Lifetime history of mixed episodes
(p = 0.017) and alcohol use disorders (p = 0.015) both
occurred in >20% of partial response and non-response groups but |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-8674 1440-1614 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0004867416664794 |