Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study

Compared with standard karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies and is thus recommended in many prenatal indications. However, evidence is still lacking on the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in cases of isolated fetal growth restrict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2021-12, Vol.225 (6), p.676.e1-676.e15
Hauptverfasser: Monier, Isabelle, Receveur, Aline, Houfflin-Debarge, Véronique, Goua, Valérie, Castaigne, Vanina, Jouannic, Jean-Marie, Mousty, Eve, Saliou, Anne-Hélène, Bouchghoul, Hanane, Rousseau, Thierry, Valat, Anne-Sylvie, Groussolles, Marion, Fuchs, Florent, Benoist, Guillaume, Degre, Sophie, Massardier, Jérôme, Tsatsaris, Vassilis, Kleinfinger, Pascale, Zeitlin, Jennifer, Benachi, Alexandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Compared with standard karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies and is thus recommended in many prenatal indications. However, evidence is still lacking on the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in cases of isolated fetal growth restriction. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of copy number variants detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and the incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotype in the detection of genetic abnormalities in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction. This retrospective study included all singleton fetuses diagnosed with fetal growth restriction and no structural ultrasound anomalies and referred to 13 French fetal medicine centers over 1 year in 2016. Fetal growth restriction was defined as an estimated fetal weight of
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.035