Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Thrombolysis for Patients With Stroke With Unknown Time of Onset

Patients waking up with stroke symptoms are often excluded from intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IV-tpa). The WAKE-UP trial, a European multicenter randomized controlled trial, proved the clinical effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-guided IV-tpa for these patients. This analysis aim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2021-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1620-1627
Hauptverfasser: Muntendorf, Louisa-Kristin, Konnopka, Alexander, König, Hans-Helmut, Boutitie, Florent, Ebinger, Martin, Endres, Matthias, Fiebach, Jochen B., Thijs, Vincent, Lemmens, Robin, Muir, Keith W., Nighoghossian, Norbert, Pedraza, Salvador, Simonsen, Claus Z., Gerloff, Christian, Thomalla, Götz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients waking up with stroke symptoms are often excluded from intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IV-tpa). The WAKE-UP trial, a European multicenter randomized controlled trial, proved the clinical effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-guided IV-tpa for these patients. This analysis aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to placebo. A Markov model was designed to analyze the cost-effectiveness over a 25-year time horizon. The model consisted of an inpatient acute care phase and a rest-of-life phase. Health states were defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Initial transition probabilities to mRS scores were based on WAKE-UP data and health state utilities on literature search. Costs were based on data from the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, literature, and expert opinion. Incremental costs and effects over the patients’ lifetime were estimated. The analysis was conducted from a formal German healthcare perspective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Treatment with IV-tpa resulted in cost savings of €51 009 and 1.30 incremental gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a 5% discount rate. Univariate sensitivity analysis revealed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio being sensitive to the relative risk of favorable outcome on mRS for placebo patients after stroke, the costs of long-term care for patients with mRS 4, and patient age at initial stroke event. In all cases, IV-tpa remained cost-effective. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis proved IV-tpa cost-effective in >95% of the simulations results. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided IV-tpa compared to placebo is cost-effective in patients with ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset. •Approximately 20% of patients with ischemic stroke wake up with symptoms of stroke. The unknown onset time excludes these patients from intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IV-tpa) due to the treatments’ limited administration period of ≥4.5 hours after the first symptom onset. The WAKE-UP trial showed the clinical effectiveness of IV-tpa if administered based on magnetic resonance imaging results.•This article focuses on the economic evaluation of IV-tpa for patients with ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset based on magnetic resonance imaging results. Using the WAKE-UP trial data, the analysis generated cost savings of €51 009 per patient and 1.30 incremental gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a 5% discount rate, and it
ISSN:1098-3015
1524-4733
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.005