Promising clinical performance of pretargeted immuno-PET with anti-CEA bispecific antibody and gallium-68-labelled IMP-288 peptide for imaging colorectal cancer metastases: a pilot study

Introduction This pilot study evaluated the imaging performance of pretargeted immunological positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) using an anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) recombinant bispecific monoclonal antibody (BsMAb), TF2 and the [ 68 Ga]Ga-labelled HSG peptide, IMP288, in patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.874-882
Hauptverfasser: Touchefeu, Y., Bailly, C., Frampas, E., Eugène, T., Rousseau, C., Bourgeois, M., Bossard, C., Faivre-Chauvet, A., Rauscher, A., Masson, D., David, A., Cerato, E., Carlier, T., Sharkey, R. M., Goldenberg, D. M., Barbet, J., Kraeber-Bodere, F., Bodet-Milin, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction This pilot study evaluated the imaging performance of pretargeted immunological positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) using an anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) recombinant bispecific monoclonal antibody (BsMAb), TF2 and the [ 68 Ga]Ga-labelled HSG peptide, IMP288, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Patients and methods Patients requiring diagnostic workup of CRC metastases or in case of elevated CEA for surveillance were prospectively studied. They had to present with elevated CEA serum titre or positive CEA tumour staining by immunohistochemistry of a previous biopsy or surgical specimen. All patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), chest-abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT), abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography using [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). For immuno-PET, patients received intravenously 120 nmol of TF2 followed 30 h later by 150 MBq of [ 68 Ga]Ga-labelled IMP288, both I.V. The gold standard was histology and imaging after 6-month follow-up. Results Eleven patients were included. No adverse effects were reported after BsMAb and peptide injections. In a per-patient analysis, immuno-PET was positive in 9/11 patients. On a per-lesion analysis, 12 of 14 lesions were positive with immuno-PET. Median SUV max , MTV and TLG were 7.65 [3.98–13.94, SD 3.37], 8.63 cm 3 [1.98–46.64; SD 14.83] and 37.90 cm 3 [8.07–127.5; SD 43.47] respectively for immuno-PET lesions. Based on a per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value were, respectively, 82%, 25%, 82% and 25% for the combination of EUS/CT/MRI; 76%, 67%, 87% and 33% for FDG-PET; and 88%, 100%, 100% and 67% for immuno-PET. Immuno-PET had an impact on management in 2 patients. Conclusion This pilot study showed that pretargeted immuno-PET using anti-CEA/anti-IMP288 BsMAb and a [ 68 Ga]Ga-labelled hapten was safe and feasible, with promising diagnostic performance. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02587247 Registered 27 October 2015
ISSN:1619-7070
1619-7089
DOI:10.1007/s00259-020-04989-3