MRS quality assessment in a multicentre study on MRS-based classification of brain tumours

This paper reports on quality assessment of MRS in the European Union‐funded multicentre project INTERPRET (International Network for Pattern Recognition of Tumours Using Magnetic Resonance; http://azizu.uab.es/INTERPRET), which has developed brain tumour classification software using in vivo proton...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NMR in biomedicine 2008-02, Vol.21 (2), p.148-158
Hauptverfasser: van der Graaf, Marinette, Julià-Sapé, Margarida, Howe, Franklyn A., Ziegler, Anne, Majós, Carles, Moreno-Torres, Angel, Rijpkema, Mark, Acosta, Dionisio, Opstad, Kirstie S., van der Meulen, Yvonne M., Arús, Carles, Heerschap, Arend
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper reports on quality assessment of MRS in the European Union‐funded multicentre project INTERPRET (International Network for Pattern Recognition of Tumours Using Magnetic Resonance; http://azizu.uab.es/INTERPRET), which has developed brain tumour classification software using in vivo proton MR spectra. The quality assessment consisted of both MR system quality assurance (SQA) and quality control (QC) of spectral data acquired from patients and healthy volunteers. The system performance of the MR spectrometers at all participating centres was checked bimonthly by a short measurement protocol using a specially designed INTERPRET phantom. In addition, a more extended SQA protocol was performed yearly and after each hardware or software upgrade. To compare the system performance for in vivo measurements, each centre acquired MR spectra from the brain of five healthy volunteers. All MR systems fulfilled generally accepted minimal system performance for brain MRS during the entire data acquisition period. The QC procedure of the MR spectra in the database comprised automatic determination of the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in a water‐suppressed spectrum and of the line width of the water resonance (water band width, WBW) in the corresponding non‐suppressed spectrum. Values of SNR > 10 and WBW 
ISSN:0952-3480
1099-1492
DOI:10.1002/nbm.1172