Optical detection of ammonia inside a stack: Comparison of different techniques
[Display omitted] •Ammonia was measured as a target gas in an artificial stack.•Optical detection techniques exhibit different resilience to absorption lineshapes.•Target gas absorption widths are sensitive to the concentrations of water and CO2.•Direct absorption and derivative detection were compa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2020-07, Vol.159, p.107746, Article 107746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Ammonia was measured as a target gas in an artificial stack.•Optical detection techniques exhibit different resilience to absorption lineshapes.•Target gas absorption widths are sensitive to the concentrations of water and CO2.•Direct absorption and derivative detection were compared with respect to calibration.•An optical multipass cell was used, completely inside an artificial stack at 140 °C.
The quantitative detection of pollutants in industrial emissions, in particular the emissions of biomass burners, requires different types of analyzers. Optical devices are usually sensitive to the transparency and dirtiness of the exhaust gases, so optical measurements are normally carried out by extracting the samples from the stacks. This paper has a twofold aim. First, we will prove that the molecular composition of the exhaust mixture (in particular the concentration of water and carbon dioxide) can deeply affect the outcome of optical analyzers, depending on the adopted detection technique. This is a critical issue, in particular with a view to the necessity of providing suitable reference methods for monitoring biomass burners emissions. Second, we will show how it is possible to measure inside an artificial stack by using an optical multipass cell located across the gas flow, even at 140 °C, or in presence of soot. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-2241 1873-412X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107746 |